| Author |
Message |
dean
Site Admin
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 6777
Location: London
Status: Offline
|
| Posted:
Mar 28, 2007 - 07:38 PM |
|
Researchers at Intel claim to have:-
| Quote: | | "created a system that lets WiFi signals, which ordinarily carry a few hundred feet, instead travel 100 kilometers, or more than 60 miles." Interestingly enough, the system supposedly relies on "modified software" running on regular WiFi equipment, and wireless access points with the newfangled software can seemingly daisy-chain directional network traffic through "several carefully aligned steerable antennas in order to eventually reach a fiber link connected to the internet." |
http://www.engadget.com/2007/03/27/inte ... ange-wifi/ |
|
|
|
 |
hfrisch
Joined: Jul 28, 2005
Posts: 80
Location: NJ - USA
Status: Offline
|
| Posted:
Mar 28, 2007 - 09:54 PM |
|
|
I have seen these before. Last year, in the Nevada desert (no people, no RF noise) there was a demo of WiFi going something like 100mi. While interesting in a technical sense and possibly of some value in developing countries - with only 3 non-overlapping channels, the noise floor in any developed area is far to high to go even 1km - maybe a bit more with good filters and directional antennas pointing at each other.
WiFi does certain thins well (like Wireless LAN, including Voice over Wireless LLAN), but laws of physics (spectrum availability and interference) are strictly enforced making these things not so useful in populated areas that have electricity and internet access. |
|
|
|
 |
ianplain
Site Admin
Joined: Jul 05, 2004
Posts: 2673
Location: Bath UK
Status: Offline
|
| Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 - 12:20 AM |
|
Hi
| Quote: | | but laws of physics (spectrum availability and interference) are strictly enforced making these things not so useful in populated areas that have electricity and internet access. |
This is a problem with many of these types of technology, The man in the white coat gets a little to excited and forgets the laws of physics and also common sense is brushed aside.
and lets not forget | Quote: | | "modified software" |
cannot overcome the laws of physics, If it could we would have had a time machine by now  .
Ian |
|
|
|
 |
martyndavies
Site Admin
Joined: Sep 13, 2006
Posts: 364
Location: The Surrey Hills
Status: Offline
|
| Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 - 01:30 PM |
|
|
I don't suppose you can do it with an aerial made from a Pringles can... |
|
|
|
 |
hfrisch
Joined: Jul 28, 2005
Posts: 80
Location: NJ - USA
Status: Offline
|
| Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 - 04:06 PM |
|
|
It is possible that you could - if you are careful about how you set up the can AND if you live somewhere that there are no other people around, or at least nobody else with WiFi or anything at 2.4GHz. |
|
|
|
 |
ianplain
Site Admin
Joined: Jul 05, 2004
Posts: 2673
Location: Bath UK
Status: Offline
|
| Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 - 05:26 PM |
|
Like video extenders, As I have learnt to my cost
Ian |
|
|
|
 |
dean
Site Admin
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 6777
Location: London
Status: Offline
|
| Posted:
Mar 29, 2007 - 05:43 PM |
|
| Quote: | | I don't suppose you can do it with an aerial made from a Pringles can |
If you wanted to network with the guy on the other mountain top you could....  |
|
|
|
 |
martyndavies
Site Admin
Joined: Sep 13, 2006
Posts: 364
Location: The Surrey Hills
Status: Offline
|
| Posted:
Jun 25, 2007 - 03:05 PM |
|
|
|
 |
dean
Site Admin
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 6777
Location: London
Status: Offline
|
| Posted:
Jun 25, 2007 - 03:44 PM |
|
I'm nominating that one "VoIP User Word of the Day"
237 miles is actually quite easy if you have the right antenna's, the right equipment to line up the two antennas (fraction of a degree out would break it) and the right atmospheric conditions.
Two points high enough to both be above the horizon line relative to each other would probably go further. |
|
|
|
 |
|