SearchSearch  Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages  recent posts Recent Posts
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
tttonyyyOffline



Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 2

Status: Offline
Posted: Jan 26, 2006 - 01:30 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Hi all,

I have a simple setup - a Granstream Budgetone BT-100 connected via NAT on a D-Link DSL-G604T.

According to the STUN server (at sipdiscount), this router uses symmetric NAT, and everything I've read on the internet says that STUN and symmetric NAT don't work together.

But I can make both incoming and outgoing calls just fine.

Can someone shed some light on this? Has the STUN server incorrectly identified the router as symmetric?
(I have no UDP port ranges mapped to my phone, either).

Tony
View user's profile Send private message
telochoOffline



Joined: Feb 09, 2006
Posts: 2

Status: Offline
Posted: Feb 09, 2006 - 01:28 AM Reply with quote Back to top
You may have a router that supports uPnP and this is enabled. Your Windows is requesting the ports to be opened via this protocol.
View user's profile Send private message
tttonyyyOffline



Joined: Jan 26, 2006
Posts: 2

Status: Offline
Posted: Feb 09, 2006 - 12:17 PM Reply with quote Back to top
telocho :
You may have a router that supports uPnP and this is enabled. Your Windows is requesting the ports to be opened via this protocol.


This is what's confusing me - uPnP is turned off on the router, and my Windows PC doesn't even know about the standalone phone's existence.

My understanding of SIP and keepalives is that the phone will keep registering (or sending SIP "option" messages) to the STUN server to keep the SIP UDP port open on a NAT router. But when a media stream is initialised, symmetric NAT won't route other ports opened on the WAN to the IP address on the phone (even if the packets have the phone's IP address). The three other types of NAT do route other ports for the same destination IP, even if they are opened on different ports.

So I don't see how it can work if it really is symmetric NAT, as reported by the STUN server?
View user's profile Send private message
telochoOffline



Joined: Feb 09, 2006
Posts: 2

Status: Offline
Posted: Aug 10, 2006 - 06:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
The following could be valid in your case: Hosted NAT traversal.

The session border controller (SBC) if they have one, at sipdiscount, might detect that you use NAT. Then it will work as well. Reregister times then are shortened to 30 sec so that the NAT/firewall will not close ports.

(Hosted NAT traversal and STUN are no good combination, my recommendation always to switch off STUN and test first if it works without)
View user's profile Send private message
maziloOffline
Moderator


Joined: Feb 09, 2005
Posts: 2280
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Posted: Aug 11, 2006 - 12:03 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Do you have either outbound proxy or regiatrar server options enabled on your ATA?
View user's profile Send private message
deanOffline
Site Admin


Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 7868
Location: London
Status: Offline
Posted: Aug 11, 2006 - 01:15 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Yes, I suspect telocho is correct, you're using their proxy.

Disable STUN. If it still works, that's the reason.

If that is the case, port forwarding is likely to improve call quality for you (one less thing in the chain).

Dean
View user's profile Send private message


View previous topic Printable version Log in to check your private messages View next topic

Post new topic   Reply to topic
Forum Rules and Guidelines | About VoIP User | Privacy Policy


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
Comments and posts are property of the poster, all the rest (c) 2003-2008 VoIP User Limited.

VoIP User Limited is incorporated in England and Wales under Company Number 6694577.

No part of this site may be reproduced without our prior consent.