Dean Bubley has an interesting idea whereby the cost of your mobility depends on the extent of your mobility.
He distinguishes nomadicity from mobility and comes up with what he calls "velocity-specific pricing":-
| Quote: |
| I wonder, though, if the push for geo-specific pricing is actually a special case of what should really be in place: velocity-specific pricing. Maybe we should be pricing mobile communications based on how mobile you are. A call when you're stationary is cheaper than a call when you're walking, which is cheaper than one made on the bus/in a car, and so on to trains & planes. If you're on a femtocell in your bedroom, or connected via WiFi/FON in your neighbours house, you shouldn't be subsidising the calls of the salesman in his Mercedes driving 80mph down the M4. |
http://disruptivewireless.blogspot.com/ ... emium.html
It's an interesting concept. In terms of my personal experience with my mobile device, commuting on the train is the only time when I really value the ability to be moving (and I'm more interested in email, not voice, on the train). Other than that if I'm on the phone I'm probably stationary. I would imagine that a WiFi access point, if available whenver I'm stationary, could cater to 90% of my mobile needs. I'm mostly nomadic.